Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 69 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Honda HR-V. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 5.6 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Pacifica | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.61 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 290 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`268 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |