Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 41 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 354 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |