Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 7 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 68 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 74 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 3`300 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |