Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 30 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 415 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |