Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 54 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1930 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`990 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |