Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 57 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 825 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 6.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 5 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler has 234 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |