Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 85 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 855 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 6.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 13 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1194 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler has 209 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |