Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 27 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 585 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.63 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 278 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |