Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mercedes ML 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 47 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes ML 2008 3.0 engine: A reliable yet dynamic engine. Frequent oil leaks, engine crankcase ventilation problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 56 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 410 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`830 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |