Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 95 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 230 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 100 litres | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 73 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 535 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 394 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |