Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 409 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |