Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 13 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 14 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 434 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |