Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 14 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 39 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 963 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |