Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Nissan Patrol 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 17 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Patrol. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 83 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2226 litres | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 669 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`506 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |