Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000

 
Jeep Wrangler
2002 - 2007
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 4.0 Petrol3.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 177 HP202 HP
Torque: 296 NM318 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10 seconds
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.513.2
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres71 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle530 km in combined cycle
580 km on highway650 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 3.95 m4.28 m
Width: 1.68 m1.88 m
Height: 1.75 m1.84 m
Jeep Wrangler is smaller.
Jeep Wrangler is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1303 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0642`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 94003800
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Pajero has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv