Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine Toyota RAV4 2000 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 25 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 358 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 864 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |