Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Subaru Forester 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 87 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 53 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 387 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 67 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |