Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 17 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 37 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |