Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 22 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.1 | |
| Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 88 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 320 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1045 litres | 1700 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space (by 95 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 655 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`810 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`605 kg | 2`155 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 395 kg | 655 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 66 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |