Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 185 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 66 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 784 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1002 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |