Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 14 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 85 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 52 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 1951 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 78 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 906 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.8 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |