Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Porsche Cayenne 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 107 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 13.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 83 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 1770 litres | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 220 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Cayenne (by 725 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Porsche Cayenne, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |