Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Nissan Patrol 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Patrol) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 252 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, but torque is 37 NM less than Nissan Patrol. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 45 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 605 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 285 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |