Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Nissan Patrol 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 17 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 165 NM less than Nissan Patrol. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 63 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 605 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 285 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |