Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 359 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 100 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 15.1 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 540 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 69 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 1076 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1045 litres | 2407 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 756 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1362 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |