Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Lexus RX 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 61 HP less power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 12.2 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 79 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 2130 litres | |
|
Lexus RX has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 119 litres less trunk space than the Lexus RX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 1085 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Lexus RX has
| |