Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Lexus GX 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Lexus GX is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 95 HP less power than Lexus GX, whereas torque is 219 NM less than Lexus GX. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 14.7 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus GX, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used also on Lexus LX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 94 cm shorter than the Lexus GX, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 1238 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1045 litres | 2513 litres | |
|
Lexus GX has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 918 litres less trunk space than the Lexus GX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus GX (by 1468 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2.2 metres less than that of the Lexus GX, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`605 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 395 kg | 650 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 65 procentiem less than Lexus GX. Therefore, Lexus GX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Lexus GX has
| |