Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Land Rover Defender 2002

 
Jeep Wrangler
2002 - 2007
Land Rover Defender
2002 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Diesel
Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing beltDouble-row timing chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 143 HP122 HP
Torque: 215 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds17.5 seconds
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive.
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 21 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, but torque is 85 NM less than Land Rover Defender. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.410.1
Real fuel consumption: 12.4 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway660 km on highway
610 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 15 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand CaravanUsed also on Land Rover Discovery
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ...  More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 3.95 m3.88 m
Width: 1.68 m1.79 m
Height: 1.78 m2.08 m
Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 30 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1045 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0003`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 9400no data
Pros and Cons: Jeep Wrangler has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Land Rover Defender has
  • timing chain engine
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv