Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs BMW X3 2004

 
Jeep Wrangler
2002 - 2007
BMW X3
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 143 HP204 HP
Torque: 215 NM410 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds8.2 seconds
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving.
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 61 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 195 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.1
Real fuel consumption: 12.4 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 195 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway910 km on highway
610 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 215 mm (8.5 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Engine production duration: 15 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand CaravanInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect.
Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ...  More about Jeep Wrangler 2002 2.4 engine 

BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ...  More about BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 3.95 m4.56 m
Width: 1.68 m1.85 m
Height: 1.78 m1.67 m
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher.
Jeep Wrangler is 61 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1045 litres1560 litres
BMW X3 has more luggage space.
Jeep Wrangler has 160 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 515 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.8 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`355
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 94004600
Pros and Cons: Jeep Wrangler has
  • timing belt engine
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
BMW X3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv