Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Nissan Patrol 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 296 NM | 348 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 23 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Nissan Patrol. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 15.1 | |
| Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Wrangler 1996 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 109 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 810 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |