Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Jeep Cherokee 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 296 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 67 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 16.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 460 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 36 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |