Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 7 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 109 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 85 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 742 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Jeep Wrangler has 427 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 365 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |