Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 60 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 117 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 14.1 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 85 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |