Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Suzuki Vitara 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 18 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 14 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 4 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 24 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | 438 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 52 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The Suzuki Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 1077 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.8 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |