Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Suzuki Samurai 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 54 HP more power than Suzuki Samurai, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Suzuki Samurai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Suzuki Samurai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Samurai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 490 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.53 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 44 cm longer than the Suzuki Samurai, 21 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Samurai has
| |