Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Nissan Patrol 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Patrol is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 127 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 214 NM less than Nissan Patrol. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 18.2 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 6.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 990 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Patrol engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 25 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 113 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 4 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 183 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 183 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 315 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | 2287 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Patrol (by 772 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 3`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |