Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 118 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 221 NM less than Dodge Durango. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 16.8 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 103 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | 2482 litres | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 217 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 967 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |