Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs BMW X5 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 118 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 186 NM | 410 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 66 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 224 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 9.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 93 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
570 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
BMW X5 2001 2.9 engine: Overall, the M57 diesel engine is known for its high reliability and can deliver an exceptionally long service life when properly maintained with high-quality fuel and oil. Fuel quality is especially critical ... More about BMW X5 2001 2.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.88 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 79 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 465 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | 1550 litres | |
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 150 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 35 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.8 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 2`685 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 13 200 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
BMW X5 has
| |