Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 59 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 2 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.5 | 12.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 82 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1223 litres | 2050 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 726 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 827 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |