Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1985
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 48 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 25 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.0 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.1 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 675 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 500 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 87 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1223 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 3.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |