Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 22 HP less power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 51 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 14.6 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 440 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 61 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1223 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 846 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 877 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`950 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`460 kg | 1`895 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 615 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Toyota 4-Runner. Therefore, Toyota 4-Runner is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |