Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 51 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 13.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.8 l/100km | 15.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1790 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 532 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.85 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |