Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 83 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 10.8 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 259 mm (10.2 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Pacifica | Used also on Toyota Tundra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.65 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |