Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Porsche Cayenne 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 199 HP | 290 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 385 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 91 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Porsche Cayenne. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 12.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 15.8 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km | |
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
630 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
500 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 259 mm (10.2 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 21 years | 3 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Pacifica | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 5 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1770 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.85 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`945 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |