Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Lexus RX 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 5 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 32 NM more than Lexus RX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 12.2 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 1 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 2130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.85 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Lexus RX has
| |