Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Lexus GX 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 97 HP less power than Lexus GX, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Lexus GX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 12.8 | |
|
The Lexus GX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus GX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Lexus GX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 259 mm (10.2 inches) | 206 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus GX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Pacifica | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Land Cruiser, Lexus GS, Toyota Tundra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus GX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Lexus GX, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1833 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1833 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1833 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 489 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.65 metres more than that of the Lexus GX, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Lexus GX has
| |