Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Wrangler) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 73 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 325 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.8 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Pacifica | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 22 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.25 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |