Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Volvo XC90 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 253 mm (10 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1837 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 485 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.25 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |