Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 8 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 253 mm (10 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1837 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 485 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.25 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |