Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 253 mm (10 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.35 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |